See G.L. ?r2s$M[1c2p}p1|5J]30X zT"%t K@-Hs9ro[1 Fh/ph ;[@IcH>c2[Ry3s&-I)yL~f>hO J&;[email protected]+uR}BEc7eO,x:l Hv|2lrL{ Z.Gm[4:m&w`HfK'kl,fi 7lcIRV~sP3MJD{B-u` F\{@[RK{F7VG;zm:x. [^|*YU/G xz}E1i#5["Rw0s*rx`=GXw`Y5l>8K77v[6-_** !%G=Y9LsSD#bMn#i#mwc+v?4J Y1Gs/,ESTI,S7 U|/8l{6[` V In a unanimous ruling, the First Department reversed the motion courts holding that Red Hook waived its affirmative defense of illegality. Rule 8(d) sets up a straightforward way of dealing with failure to deny averments: (1) If the averments are contained in a pleading to which a responsive pleading is authorized, the pleader must either utilize the opportunity or be taken to have waived it. 0000002556 00000 n 416, 425, 426, 159 N.E.2d 417, 419 (1959). 6 0 obj 0000000910 00000 n During RHCTs tenure, RHCT entered an equipment lease agreement with ASI (the Lease) for certain inland marine equipment, then valued by ASI at approximately $10 million (the Equipment). (3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief. More often, however, particularized pleadings merely result in wasted time and effort, because the claimed defects are matters of form which are subsequently corrected by amendment. 0000001482 00000 n 2d 832, 833-34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). This will undoubtedly waste party and judicial resources and distract from key litigation issues. 9. endobj The only Massachusetts statutes dealing with this point, G.L. The party raising the affirmative defense has the burden of proof on establishing that it applies. ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the official website. (Page, 1926) 11305, 11314; Utah Rev.Stat.Ann. CPLR 3018 (b) contains the following, non-exhaustive list of defenses that should be affirmatively pleaded in an answer: Arbitration and award Collateral Estoppel Culpable conduct of the plaintiff under CPLR Article 14-A Discharge in bankruptcy Illegality Fraud Infancy or other disability of the defendant Payment Release Res Judicata The force and application of Rule 11 are not diminished by the deletion. Note to Subdivision (f). Corp. v. Music & Television Corp., 339 Mass. ", "Second, the declaration shall state concisely and with substantial certainty the substantive facts necessary to constitute the cause of action.". The Suffolk County Commercial Division (Emerson, J.) QoF 1rG@&SNeLghzvw%&Et? }F>T.u}el;KL`spG3))epGe+Z`*Wp)/xGt>(h 8:)k,sjz*fc0'nF[DX]}G1uKsjAJz/ 7:2yV^,bm(U=JO_%( ^:As 4. 14pVP9- r`dZSSWh1 %, c. 231, 85Aimposes upon the defendant-registered owner of an automobile involved in a collision the responsibility for setting up as an affirmative defense in his answer a denial that the automobile was being operated by a person for whose conduct the defendant was legally responsible. It is also important in shaping the judgment, seeRule 54(c)and in determining whether a jury trial is warranted. CPLR 3018 (b) lists the defenses commonly asserted . Like a claim for relief, an affirmative defense must plead sufficient ultimate facts to survive a motion to strike. However, a litigant should not depend on judicial discretion to raise a defense on the hope that the defensewill be introduced into the case without having been affirmativelypleaded. <> Rules, Address If an asserted affirmative defense is not an affirmative defense at all, but rather consists of opinions, theories, legal conclusions, or argument, then a motion to strike should also attack it on this basis. <> As stated in Chapter 2 "The Legal System in the United States", a criminal defendant will be acquitted if the prosecution cannot prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. The absence of prejudice or surprise to the plaintiffwas the key factor for Justice Emerson in permitting thedefendants partial-constructive-eviction defense. . ,#R({H8d3v+|"}R Johnson answered and pled "the affirmative defense of the four (4) year Statute of . What affirmative defenses must be pled? stream bGlY%Ep Chris Craft Indus., Inc. v. Van Valkenburg, 267 So. 0000007150 00000 n . [ 13 0 R] The feedback will only be used for improving the website. Rules, Joint (As amended Feb. 28, 1966, eff. The defendant opposed the motion, asserting apartial-constructive-eviction defense,and cross-moved for leave to amend its answer to assert two counterclaims against the plaintiff. On the other hand, by raising for the first time an issue on which he does not have the burden of production or persuasion, a defendant may conceivably run afoul of the doctrine of "invited error." 0000001079 00000 n In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, waiver, and any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense. xref Want more tips on New York practice and procedure? :n/Xg;Zz+9wA JFMP7-Yr[r`uMpu6Mkz)mc8czq3"J,|nr In contrast, an affirmative defense is a defense that, if proven, would mitigate or eradicate the defendant's negligent conduct alleged in the complaint. Rule 8(a)(1) provides that a pleading shall contain "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief alters prior practice. Moreover, all affirmative defense elements must be pled. A;C-+% )|\\%%2J7bSz6mMg1|F99g&D8 05=OMd;\w/b1`ortQ!F=bJpx[88Vi Unenforceability under the statute of frauds. In granting partial summary judgment, the court rejected RHCTs illegality argument because it was not pleaded as an affirmative defense. (e) Construing Pleadings. O Judicial Council of California Civil Jury Instructions (2022 edition) Download PDF. for the Day, Supplemental See Conn.Practice Book (1934) 107, 108, and 122; Conn.Gen.Stat. Session Daily, Senate Media In responding to a pleading, a party must affirmatively state any avoidance or affirmative defense, including: accord and satisfaction; arbitration and award; assumption of risk; contributory negligence; duress; estoppel; failure of consideration; fraud; illegality; injury by fellow servant; laches; license; payment; release; res judicata; However, a pleader who intends to controvert all its averments may do so by general denial subject to the obligations set forth in Rule 11. Spreadsheet, Minnesota c. 231, 1A) or unless they belonged to the same division of actions. For these reasons it is confusing to describe discharge as an affirmative defense. Let's start with the Black's Law Dictionary definition of "affirmative defense": "A defendant's assertion of facts and arguments that, if true, will defeat the plaintiff's or prosecution's claim, even if all the allegations in the complaint are true." Too often defendants (and counter-defendants) assert affirmative defenses made from whole cloth. Select Accept to consent or Reject to decline non-essential cookies for this use. Rule 11 applies by its own terms. Note to Subdivision (d). It should be emphasized that Rule 8(a)(1) does not alter the statutory requirements regarding the omission of names in Superior Court divorce proceedings, G.L. This follows substantially English Rules Under the Judicature Act (The Annual Practice, 1937) O. Topic (Index), Rules If you want fraud as an affirmative defense in a breach of contract case, how might you assert it? In responding to a pleading, a party must affirmatively state any avoidance or affirmative defense, including: accord and satisfaction; arbitration and award; assumption of risk; contributory negligence; duress; estoppel; failure of consideration; fraud; illegality; Compare the English practice, English Rules Under the Judicature Act (The Annual Practice, 1937) O. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a pleadingincluding the jurisdictional groundsmay do so by a general denial. DFL/GOP, House Affirmative Defense - Waiver CACI No. Discharge in bankruptcy. 12 0 obj and Legislative Business, House 735 ILCS 5/2-602. ?CAK:3SzlP:kJw. If it is an affirmative defense, then it should be attacked based upon deficiencies in its pleading; whether it makes or assumes an admission to the facts alleged in the plaintiff's complaint and, notwithstanding, raises new matter excusing the defendant's purportedly illicit conduct. Day, Combined Audio/Video, Legislative Research, Please remove any contact information or personal data from your feedback. Initially, a movant must determine whether the affirmative defense at issue legally qualifies as an affirmative defense or is simply gobbledygook masquerading as one. Indeed, a defense will be stricken if it is insufficient as a matter of law. . If it is a fake affirmative defense, then, in addition to the aforementioned reasons, it should be attacked based upon impermissibly pleading opinions, theories, legal conclusions, or argument. It does not, however, seek to regulate the substantive question of distribution of the burden of producing evidence or of persuading the trier of fact. 18 0 obj <> endobj Indeed, such a defense is no affirmative defense at all. A Reminder From The Commercial Division That Disloyalty Doesnt Pay Literally! ), Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules1937. the late assertion of an affirmative defense] in this circuit." Id. 161 0 obj <>stream affirmative defense must be pled to avoid unfair surprise or prejudice to the plaintiff. In . c. 106, 3-307, reach the same result. %PDF-1.5 No technical forms of pleading or motions are required. 302, 155 N.E.2d 409 (1959). p[e%H.x3x2JUe$ 8f>/ *q/Z"_d4Gf6 (9SL{yoY In certain cases, the defendant can either deny that a criminal element(s) exists or simply sit back and wait for the prosecution to . However, where the defendant raises the defense in motions (many affirmative defenses can be asserted as a basis for a motion under CPLR 3211), for example, the courts have ruled that the defense may be entertained because there is no surprise or prejudice by its assertion. 18 13 When a party has mistakenly designated a defense as a counterclaim or a counterclaim as a defense, the court on terms, if justice so requires, shall treat the pleading as if there had been a proper designation. <> Fraud. A plaintiff is as much entitled to be aware of the ground upon which it is claimed he should not recover as is a defendant to be apprised of the basis of the plaintiffs claim. Id. What happens, however, when the defendant fails to plead an affirmative defense? RHCT has not shown that it previously raised a concern about trespassing or illegality. 8. However, they are not the same. Illegality. (3) Inconsistent Claims or Defenses. Before a litigant can competently evaluate whether an asserted affirmative defense should be attacked with a motion to strike, knowledge of what constitutes such a defense is required. c. 231, 38: "The allegations and denials of each party shall be so construed by the court as to secure as far as possible substantial precision and certainty.". When two or more statements are made in the alternative and one of them if made independently would be sufficient, the pleading is not made insufficient by the insufficiency of one or more of the alternative statements. Please let us know how we can improve this page. In responding to a pleading, a party must: (A) state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and. In equity practice, a bill would be objectionable as multifarious if separate and distinct wrongs, each dependent upon its own facts, were joined in a bill. Members. 10. Introductions, Fiscal 0000006665 00000 n Information, Caucuses - (1) In General. Meetings, Standing affirmative Although entrapment was not a defense at common law, it may now be pled as a defense in all federal and state jurisdictions. c. 231, 29 andG.L. 1960), cert. Calendar, General Orders of the Review, Minnesota Issues 4 0 obj (main office): 400 RXR Plaza, Uniondale, NY 11556 (516) 227-0700, Affirmatively Plead Your Defenses, or Risk Waiving Them Goodbye. An allegation in any pleading that a place is a public way shall be taken as admitted unless a party specifically denies such allegation. o,SAPT_;q~"J'aH">ty=]]D{;u6=iLtq5'bg8%^D( Under Rule 8(c) such disputation is called an affirmative defense; the Rule requires the defendant to set forth any and all affirmative defenses, including, as under prior law, "any facts which would entitle him in equity to be absolutely and unconditionally relieved against the plaintiff's claim or cause of action or against a judgment recovered by the plaintiff in such action,"G.L. Such an "affirmative defense" will very likely be no affirmative defense at all when viewed against the causes of action in the case at bar. (1930) 55085514. Asserting legally insufficient affirmative defenses comes at a cost, which at the very least will require you to expend litigation resources at a motion hearing noticed by the government to strike your affirmative defenses under Fla. R. Civ. These changes are intended to be stylistic only. Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.140(b) and (f) both permit motions to strike. 2d 432, 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). ASI argues that an illegality defense is an affirmative defense which must be pleaded in a responsive pleading or addressed in a motion to dismiss lest it be waived. The provisions ofRule 15are available to relieve the defendant of the consequences of any admission subsequently discovered to be incorrect. Tropical Exterminators, Inc. v. Murray, 171 So. When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. 146 0 obj <> endobj This principle, which so far as the Reporters can determine has not yet been enunciated by the Massachusetts Court, holds that if a defendant alleges a fact, he cannot be heard to complain if the trial court charges the jury that the defendant has assumed the burden of proving that fact. htN0o=te !! Dec. 15, 2016). Appeals had held that "[a]n affirmative defense is subject to the same pleading requirements as is the complaint." Woodfield v. Bowman, 193 F.3d 354, 362 (5th Cir. Thereafter, the plaintiff must file a reply to the affirmative defense. And so, in the Courts view, the plaintiff could hardly contend it would be prejudiced or surprised by the defense. Labels, Joint Departments, Constitutional Amendments, Multimedia Audio, P. 1.110(d); St. Paul Mercury Ins. 2. (Mason, 1927) 9266; N.Y.C.P.A. Unlike prior procedure, Rule 8(a)(2) permits the pleader to seek in his claim both legal and equitable relief, either together or in the alternative. How To Attack Insufficiently Pled Affirmative Defenses. It Seems You Cant Waive The Affirmative Defense Of Illegality After All, The Anti-Retaliation Provisions Of The False Claims Act, Eligibility Under The IRS Whistleblower Program, The Process of Submitting A Whistleblower Claim, The Whistleblower Must Voluntarily Provide Original Information, The Whistleblowers Information Must Lead To a Successful Enforcement Action, The Confidentiality Protections Under The SEC/CFTC Whistleblower Program, Anti-Retaliation Under The SEC And CFTC Whistleblower Programs, KNET, INC. V. RUOCCO: Issuing Stock For Inadequate Consideration, Arbitration Agreements May Not Be Enforceable Even When They Are Clear And Unambiguous. %PDF-1.4 % for Civil Procedure Rule 8: General rules of pleading, Rule 7: Pleadings allowed: Form of motions, Rule 8.1: Special requirements for certain consumer debts. Brighams Cafe Inc. v. Price Bros. Co., 334 Mass. When there is any good faith doubt on the matter, the allegation will be denied by the defendant, and properly so. !cx}JHVA^" Suggestions are presented as an open option list only when they are available. O4jJGMBd_p]}^6Aa}[Rwv14q h0p +r9mTNJ`J> The language of Rule 8 has been amended as part of the general restyling of the Civil Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. (1) In General. Former recovery. 2d 211, 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). (2) Alternative Statements of a Claim or Defense. Estoppel. SeePayson v. Macomber, 85 Mass. The affirmative defenses listed in Rule 8(c) are only a partial list of defenses which should be set forth affirmatively and the rule provides that any "matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense" must be pleaded. . Barret v. City of Margate, 743 So. This is based on the theory that a later amendment of the answer could properly introduce the defense, and that something as drastic as summary judgment should not be predicated on a pleading omission that a simple amendment could correct. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation. F 6. Rather, an affirmative defense must raise some new matter which defeats the opposing partys otherwise valid claim. If a responsive pleading is not required, an allegation is considered denied or avoided. Averments in a pleading to which no responsive pleading is required or permitted shall be taken as denied or avoided. Former Rule 8(b) required a pleader denying part of an averment to specify so much of it as is true and material and * * * deny only the remainder. [A]nd material is deleted to avoid the implication that it is proper to deny something that the pleader believes to be true but not material. . Behind Rule 8(b) lies the simple principle that a defendant's answer should unmistakably indicate to both Court and plaintiff precisely which aspects of the complaint are admitted, and which are controverted. But simply listing affirmative defenses is not enough. Merger is now successfully accomplished. See [former] Equity Rules 25 (Bill of ComplaintContents), and 30 (AnswerContentsCounterclaim). Denials shall fairly meet the substance of the averments denied. When pleading defenses, certainty is required; pleading conclusions of law unsupported by allegations of ultimate fact is legally insufficient. (2) If the averments are contained in a pleading to which responsive pleading is not authorized, all averments are automatically taken to have been denied. 5 RHCT claimed that by delivering the Equipment to the locations identified by ASI, it would have required RHCT to trespass or otherwise violate the law. T 7. While RHCT has referred to the issue of having the permission of the site owner during the pendency of this case, for example, by demanding that ASI provide evidence of permission to use the site when the Third Location was specified, the issue appears to have been touched on only in the context of questioning whether RHCT would be able to access the site and complete delivery. Compare also [former] Equity Rule 18 (PleadingsTechnical Forms Abrogated). 0000000616 00000 n PB |\MF,S5^*;eKS/\itQ3)+u+e27!,vqYv;+{?S[l|.Q7mG|\{54Ye@ggv,EB ^r`a u}x-{) SWcs`#.Yt0f1PQSdm1sR[RzXwsK6~] Sw"fVpQ"]dSFpQ9NOB? 2d 483, 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). RHCT objected to the location because delivery would block city streets for a full day and was not within the 20 mile limit provided in the Lease. In Texas, defendants must assert affirmative defenses in their Answer at the beginning of the case or risk not being able to use them later. Directory, Legislative All statements shall be made subject to the obligations set forth inRule 11. 0000002066 00000 n In responding to a pleading, a party must affirmatively state any avoidance or affirmative defense, including: (2) Mistaken Designation. 15 0 obj If a party mistakenly designates a defense as a counterclaim, or a counterclaim as a defense, the court must, if justice requires, treat the pleading as though it were correctly designated, and may impose terms for doing so. Discovery Sanctions Alert: Failure to Include Withheld Items on Privilege Log Lands Party in Hot Water, Commercial Division Grants $1 Million Punitive-Damage Award for Diversion of Companys IP in Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Commercial Division Says Not Every Storm Triggers Force Majeure, LIMITS ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE: A NEW PROPOSAL TO AMEND COMMERCIAL DIVISION RULE 27, Infancy or other disability of the defendant. 3. endobj 2 0 obj Council, Schedules, Calendars, 49ViuPw-VOpQ^oZ=U kJ zqAPo#; ad q >D~_$&u G`5~GxE-wlx BV-biW;1whu\u^,zl;$S~FB]z1 oH!^%L-ky%N)]tCm(*m%2dqXI4D\I"XHYi Note to Subdivision (a). (1) In General. An affirmative defense to a civil lawsuit or criminal charge is a fact or set of facts other than those alleged by the plaintiff or prosecutor which, if proven by the defendant, defeats or mitigates the legal consequences of the defendant's otherwise unlawful conduct. <> Changes Made After Publication and Comment. Compare 2 Ind.Stat.Ann. 69, 73 (1861). (4) Denying Part of an Allegation. and convincing evidence: 1. Finally, a movant must be cognizant of the "within 20 days after service of the answer or reply" timeline imposed by Rule 1.140(b). . Certain statutes pertaining to real estate may, however, require unique particularity. Only three responses are proper: (1) an admission of the allegations of the paragraph; (2) a denial of those allegations; or (3) a disclaimer of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of those allegations. The change is epitomized by the statutory terms "substantive facts" and "cause of action." Rule 8(a)(2) provides that the claim contain a demand for judgment for the relief to which the pleader deems himself entitled. Prescription. . Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. A helpful tip is to remember that an affirmative defense cannot stand on its own if the complaint is dismissed. Payment (extinction of the claim or demand). endobj If a party is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of an averment, the party shall so state and this has the effect of a denial. CPLR 3018 (b) contains the following, non-exhaustive list of defenses that should be affirmatively pleaded in an answer: Arbitration and award Collateral Estoppel Culpable conduct of the. (a) Each averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct. If you want the court to consider . Committee 2d 890, 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). 222, 5 L.Ed.2d 189 (1960): "It is difficult to believe that counsel who signed this answer had good grounds to assert, among other things, that his client did not either own, operate, or manage the vessel, that the plaintiff was not employed by the stevedore, and that he was not injured, or even aboard the vessel. How To Attack Fake Affirmative Defenses. Subdivision (c)(1). See Note to Rule 1, supra. A party shall state in short and plain terms his defenses to such claim asserted and shall admit or deny the averments upon which the adverse party relies. See S.J.C. endstream endobj 436 0 obj <>stream G.L. Under Rule 8(c) such disputation is called an affirmative defense; the Rule requires the defendant to set forth any and all affirmative defenses, including, as under prior law, "any facts which would entitle him in equity to be absolutely and unconditionally relieved against the plaintiff's claim or cause of action or against a judgment . endobj 6. (G.L. Aug. 1, 1987; Apr. State v. Cohen, 568 So. Please limit your input to 500 characters. This requirement was omitted from Rule 8(b) for several reasons: (1) Unlike the questions of the genuineness of a signature or the public ownership of a place, which are susceptible of definite answers and will not often be denied, the legal relationship between the registered owner of a motor vehicle and its operator will often call for a conclusion upon which reasonable minds may differ. ASI asserted many claims against RHCT, including one for breach of contract. A .mass.gov website belongs to an official government organization in Massachusetts. by Topic (Index), Session (d) Pleading to Be Concise and Direct; Alternative Statements; Inconsistency. 2016). An affirmative defense is not a separate cause of action. Blvd., St. Paul, MN 55155, Pleading to be Concise and Direct; Consistency, Minnesota House of P. 1.140(b). 0000002593 00000 n No technical forms of pleading or motions are required. The Reporters agree with Professor Moore, 2A Moore, Federal Practice, 8.27[2], that the mere raising of the defense should not shift any burden to the defendant; they recommend this position unequivocally. It is a breach of counsel's obligation to the court to file an answer creating issues that counsel does not affirmatively believe have a basis.". (b) Defenses; form of denials. 1. endobj h214R0Pw/+QL)6)C(0e4A(1X.V? U? The former Rule 8(b) and 8(e) cross-references to Rule 11 are deleted as redundant. Rock-Ola Mfg. July 1, 1966; Mar. Cal. <<46F35B8151BFF6428C703D4C7CE8A790>]/Prev 41333>> Services, Legislators <> c. 231, 22, which permitted "the general issue" in real and mixed actions. 28, 2010, eff. 319 (1925);McNulty v. Whitney, 273 Mass. c. 208, 10. The rule merely establishes the burden of pleading, i.e., of raising the issue. A somewhat related point concerns the possible working of an estoppel on the defendant who pleads, first, a denial of all operative allegations, then an affirmative defense. 434 0 obj <>stream matter in the form of an affirmative defense. 19, r.r. & Loan, Inc., 528 So. A party may state as many separate claims or defenses as it has, regardless of consistency. c. 231, 30 could reasonably be interpreted to deal with the matter of capacity of a party for other purposes, these latter instances are so rare that they do not warrant specific mention in Rule 8(b). If you need assistance, please contact the Trial Court Law Libraries. endstream endobj 437 0 obj <>stream (2) DenialsResponding to the Substance. Yaeger v. Lora Realty, Inc., 245 So. In pleading to a preceding pleading, a party shall set forth affirmatively accord and satisfaction, arbitration and award, assumption of risk, contributory negligence, discharge in bankruptcy, duress, estoppel, failure of consideration, fraud, illegality, injury by fellow servant, laches, license, payment, release, res judicata, statute of frauds, statute of limitations, waiver, and any other matter constituting an avoidance or affirmative defense. 271, 274, 17 N.E.2d 103, 104 (1938) is eliminated. Five days later, RHCT informed ASl that the second location was not acceptable, primarily because the owner of the site did not give RHCT permission to store the Equipment at that location. . endobj Coughlin v. Coughlin, 312 Mass. Thank you for your website feedback! When a party has mistakenly designated a defense as a counterclaim or a counterclaim as a defense, the court on terms, if justice so requires, shall treat the pleading as if there had been a proper designation. Rule 8 reflects the view that the primary function of pleadings is not to formulate the precise issues for trial but rather to give fair notice of the claims and defenses of the parties. (5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . This will control in the event of a default judgment, seeRule 54(c). List, Bill %PDF-1.4 % Code 820.2 and derivative immunity under Cal. While Rule 8(a)(1) allows the pleading of conclusions,Rule 12(e)(motion for more definite statement) andRule 12(f)(motion to strike) cure the only real impropriety of the pleading of conclusions, namely, that the pleading is too vague to form a responsive pleading.
John Richardson Professor, Articles W