By now you will have a deep understanding of the paper's content - and you may have some concerns about plagiarism. This has enough data points to make sure the data are reliable. During these checks you should keep in mind best practice: If the research fails to reach relevant best practice standards, it's usual to recommend rejection. This status is shown to all the applicants. I am also concerned about the second possibility as some other peers also told me about that possibility. Under spinal anesthesia, . The manuscript describes the steps carried out to study three rural areas at low, medium and high population density in the UK: a data landscape to select study areas; the development of an activity-based model, which uses anonymised mobile network data (MND) aggregated at trip-chains level to derive travel patterns; and the development of an . This could be an issue with titles, labels, statistical notation or image quality. This should state the main question addressed by the research and summarize the goals, approaches, and conclusions of the paper. This review article analyzes the current state of the 2D and 3D deformable displays and discusses the technological challenges to be achieved for practical uses and industrial commercialization. 'Under Consideration' job status means that your application is being reviewed by HR. Editors say, "Specific recommendations for remedying flaws are VERY welcome.". The European Journal of Soil Science (EJSS) is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in . wiley manuscript status under consideration FREE COVID TEST can i take advil before a fasting blood test Book Appointment Now. This might be related to the internal administrative structure of the journal. This discipline includes fundamental Hello, I've been investigating a bunch of monomers which spontaneously react in water to form a polymer. You can also send the editorial board an email through the submission system. Rt 395 in ct 1 . If there is a resource that is not found within the Portal, authors are asked to register the resource with the appropriate resource authority. So the under consideration application status is actually typically a very good sign. Kakoli Majumder Managing Editor and Senior Writer at Editage Insights; Researcher Coach since 2015. our publication is in the same situation (in second round of submission, after performing revision experiments). I want to test chitosan nanoparticles as antimicrobial against pseudomonas How to use resazurin microtitre assay???? Your question regarding the editorial office is not very clear to me and I assume two editorial offices were mentioned in the submission system. ORCID. Wiley and the ASBMR support efforts to encourage the sharing of research data. Information Gathered: Images, Graphs and Data Tables. It is visible only to the applicant at this stage Applied An application form has been submitted via inspira, but the pre-screening process (which checks candidates' eligibility for a post) has not yet begun. If you don't, make a note now that you need to feedback on how to improve those sections. Call us at (860) 323-3807 to take advantage of our exceptional services and skills! How To Communicate With The Journal? Wiley and the ASBMR support efforts to encourage the sharing of research data. Editorial decision-making: what are the possible outcomes for a manuscript? I am still waiting to get a response from the reviewer. Of course, the research similarities may be so great that they render the work unoriginal and you have no choice but to recommend rejection. i have multi x ray images after preprocessing on it , i saved them as a vector in file .dat but this file not accepted in next stage (convolution neural network ). The remaining 17 . So in the spirit of fairness, write comments to editors as though authors might read them too. A 360 view of peer review. . Weighted means of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of intragroup and intergroup dietary variation using plant RRA data. Just very anxious!! Now that you have completed your preparations, you're ready to spend an hour or so reading carefully through the manuscript. //--> What is the main question addressed by the research? Avoid the use of the word 'significant' in your description of results. Authors are reminded that Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of pharmacology and therapeutics, focused mainly on human research relevant to patient care. Or whether it is publishable in principle and merits a detailed, careful read through. What does it add to the subject area compared with other published material? If you're following an informal report format you could structure your report in three sections: summary, major issues, minor issues. But since then didn't get any update from them. The Earth's climate is changing rapidly (IPCC, 2013) and projections indicate that drought events will increase in frequency and severity in many regions of the world (Dai, 2013; Cook et al., 2014; Swann et al., 2016).Drought can have severe effects on ecosystems (Ciais et al., 2005) and can trigger regional-scale tree mortality events (Breshears et al., 2005; McDowell et al . Are all tables and figures appropriate, sufficient, and correctly labelled? Three excellent doctoral students at the University of Dayton helped with this project. Editors will make sure that the text is at a high standard before publication. All the authors contributed to the development of the protocol. This has a major effect on the impact of a paper, since it helps it appear in search results. Despite its popularity, few studies provide empirical evidence on the role of the MBTI as a predictor of managers' leadership-related behaviors. Manuscript Types Type Abstract Length Format Tables/figu res/boxes Illustrations Useful reference Original Article Structured; up to words Up to 1500 words Up to 10 references, Vancouver The review process may take a few weeks or even months. Most editors have access to software that can check for plagiarism. Often this is where editors will want reviewers to state their recommendation - see the next section - but otherwise this area is best reserved for communicating malpractice such as suspected plagiarism, fraud, unattributed work, unethical procedures, duplicate publication, bias or other conflicts of interest. I would like to know how to calculate the thermodynamics of such a system. Author, 1 C. D. Author 2 and E. F . Early prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias using Often you can't see these until you log in to submit your review. Obviously, where older research is seminal or where aspects of the methodology rely upon it, then it is perfectly appropriate for authors to cite some older papers. Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Under Review - Issue is being examined. Wiley STATUSUnder Review1STATUSSubmittedEditorial Office . It can be a good indicator of how fast they usually process the manuscripts. 1 INTRODUCTION. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. . A guide to understanding journal statuses. The coatings exhibit remarkable surface-protective performance, including anticorrosion, antifouling, self-healing, anti-icing, and self-cleaning properties. Volume 73, Issue 3. Don't spend time polishing grammar or spelling. The structure of the review report varies between journals. While journals have a specific review period in place, the reviewers may sometimes exceed these timelines. After all, you need the context of the whole paper before deciding to reject. How original is the topic? You should consider if the referencing is adequate: Check for a well-balanced list of references that is: You should be able to evaluate whether the article meets the criteria for balanced referencing without looking up every reference. Dear Mohammad Jakir Hosen sir, thank you so much for the response. A manuscript style template can be found here. frasi giovanni falcone che le cose siano cos wiley manuscript status under consideration Highlight important findings sufficiently? Depending on the journal, the assignment may be done by technical staff, the journal's chief editor, or automatic by submission category or author suggestion. Depending on the conservation objective, de-extinction outcomes range from maintaining viable seed or embryos in the freezer, through regenerating a few individuals to keep in captivity, to establishing self-sustaining populations in the wild in large . Conflict of Interest. 3 answers. Conservation Biology welcomes submissions that address the science and practice of conserving biological diversity. With the same molecule precursor and growth procedure, we show one-billion-fold enhancement in electrical conductivities of amorphous monolayers by simply varying the growth temperature (325 C . Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Unfortunately, your shopping bag is empty. Peer Review Comments, Cover Letter And More. Status reviews have sought to evaluate whether declines in abundance or colony size have leveled off in recent decades. Answer: Once a paper is submitted to a journal, it is assigned to a handling editor who conducts an initial screening of the paper to see if it meets the basic requirements of the journal. Read this article till the end to get answers to all your questions. Hopefully, your paper will be rigorously reviewed by an expert in the field and be accepted soon in your intended journal. diensthost wpnuserservice. All Rights Reserved. Do justice to the manuscript in this context?