Wow man I didnt realize what crybabies Raiders fans are even after 10 years. Only once the forward motion of the arm is completed, and the ball tucked into the quarterback's body, would a subsequent loss of possession be considered a fumble. Knowing what we now know about Belichick, is there any chance he was turning down a first-round pick from the Bills and the opportunity to shed the richest contract in NFL history? Patriots head coach Bill Belichick referred to this game after the subsequent Tuck Rule Game, telling ESPN, "I knew what the ruling should have been because we had dealt with that play a little bit earlier in the year on the other side of it."[4]. Unfortunately, most fans will never take the time to see why the rule is there in the first place. "The Tuck Rule Game." The ruling: an incomplete pass. Anyway, the Raiders scored a TD, beat the Patriots and went on to win the Super Bowl. I'm not sure how it wouldn't be incomplete. An incomplete pass stops the clock and prevents the loss of yards from a sack. Incomplete pass? Smith runs second-fastest 40 by DL since 03, Saleh compares Carr to Stafford pre-Rams trade, Allen to be ready to roll for offseason program, How to maximize leverage of No. It would be the same as saying when a QB is handing off to a RB and the ball comes out, the QB is technically passing the ball to the RB so it should be an incomplete pass, also. Unfortunately, The Tuck Rule won't be available for next-day streaming via Watch ESPN. Accusing of spying on . Not only was it a season-changing event for a Raiders team that had the potential to go down as Super Bowl champions, but it . As for the Raiders, who are still salty about the call all these years later, their season would have been extended by about one week. QB is trying to throw a screen pass, gets bumped, running back drops screen passfumble. For one, do you know anything about football? Yes, keep the rule until each team has experienced it at least once. The officials initially called the play a recovered fumble, which would have sealed the victory for the Raiders. if i was a raiders fan my bedroom would look like finkels and my mother certainly wouldnt be giving out cookies at the door. What is the tuck rule in NFL and why is it controversial? The rule works; people have a hard time with it because they want to think the 2001 game was ruined by it. . It may have taken him a little longer to earn that genius label without that brilliant Super Bowl game plan he devised for the Rams on his resume. What has now become known as the "Tuck Rule" game was played on January 19, 2002. Well it's not a rule any more so problem solved. And referees were still left to judge whether or not a quarterback made an 'intentional' forward movement with their arm. It was a pump fake that he brought back to his body. It's been 10 years since the infamous tuck rule game, and the rule itself reared its ugly . I think everybody probably sees that and says it's a bad rule. The tuck rule was a controversial rule in American football used by the National Football League from 1999 until 2013. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.[7]. Gruden was asked about the "Tuck Rule" before the Raiders played the Patriots at Gillette Stadium on Sept. 27 . (This was also the game in which Patriots quarterback Drew Bledsoe was injured by a hit from Mo Lewis, giving backup Tom Brady a chance to play.) The 2001 AFC Divisional Playoff game between the New England Patriots and the Oakland Raiders, also known as the Tuck Rule Game or the Snow Bowl,[2][3] or sometimes referred to as Snow Bowl 2, took place on January 19, 2002, at Foxboro Stadium in Foxborough, Massachusetts, which was at the time the Patriot's home stadium. i lilke the rule n think its a good one but wouldnt care to see it removed.. fumbles in general. It sure looks like it did, or even got really really close, but there's no way you can say it 100% didn't touch it, therefore you couldn't be able to overturn the call. But there is no wording for pump, all it is intention to move the ball in a throwing motion, with no regard for the outcome of the movement. I'm just curious as to how they reacted to review back then. Blame the ones that make the rules- Perreira does a great job explaining the stupid a$$ sh!t. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Periera is wrong. Wow. if it was brady or peyton there never would of been this statement. The ball should not have to be loose in the act of passing for it to be ruled incomplete. Brady ended up completing 26 of 39 passes for 238 yards in the second half. On the field, referee Mike Carey ruled it a fumble. No such rule ever existed. Were things run differently back then? how many times has the tuck rule been called Bill Polian (Colts) is the chairman. WELL SAID theandy59 Im age 52 and watched that game myself Then the refs had the gall to add two unsportsman penalties, putting the ball on the five yard line, when in fact the game should have been over. And how its also ignored that the Pats lost a game that same year in large part to the tuck rule being called in favor of the Jets I believe. This is Bill Belichick were talking about; how many high-priced veterans have we seen him cast away from New England? The Patsies had no timeouts and the Raiders would have simply downed the ball to end the game. Oakland kneels on the ball and kills the clock. The rule not only changed how referees call the game, but it also altered the trajectory of TB12's 4. section: | slug: tom-brady-admits-controversial-tuck-rule-game-play-might-have-been-a-fumble-and-not-an-incomplete-pass | sport: football | route: article_single.us | Agree the play alone didnt lose the game for the Raiders, but the emotional swing in the game after that call was reversed was obvious. The game, known as both the Snow Bowl (for that copious and unceasing precipitation) and the Tuck Rule Game (for the enduringly controversial call that ultimately swung the contest toward the. It would be easier to make the call based on where the ball lands, regardless of if the QB is throwing or not. (GIF) : nfl. So what would have changed? If not, then watch the damn replay again and explain to me how in the hell that is not a fumble. In this case, they clearly took a victory away from the Raiders. The Raiders went to the Super Bowl the next year, but were beaten by Gruden's Buccaneers, 4821 and the Raiders did not make the playoffs again until 2016. January 16, 2019 10:09 pm PT. The Patsies got lucky, because otherwise, the game would have ended right there. Regardless, the most common throws by far are those short positive-yardage attempts.". Were talking, of course, about the infamous Tuck Rule game, in which the New England Patriots, thanks to a late Tom Brady fumble being overturned because of an obscure rule, beat the Oakland Raiders to advance to the 2002 AFC Championship Game. New England went on to win Super Bowl XXXVI, beginning a run of championships with Brady and head coach Bill Belichick, appearing in nine Super Bowls and winning six.[4][5]. Dont blame the refs for your teams lack of sack. After the officials reviewed the play, it was determined Brady was in a throwing motion and was attempting to "tuck" the ball towards his body, therefore making it an incomplete pass and resulting in the Patriots keeping the ball. And as long as were griping about refs stealing playoff wins, at best the Raider should consider themselves even with the Patriots given the atrocious officiating in the 1976 Pats-Raiders game not only was the roughing the passer call on Hamilton just as big of a game changer as the Tuck Rule (BTW, that was totally a judgment call and it was BS), on the Pats previous possession, as they tried to pick up a first down to ice the game, LB Vilapiano locked Russ Francis arms at the elbows preventing him from reaching out and catching an easy pass that would have likely ended the game. But now Pereira works for FOX, not the NFL, and he says that the league needs to ditch the tuck rule. According Paragraph 3036 of Marine Corps Order P1020.34G, which governs uniform regulations, wearing an olive-drab undershirt while in cammies is optional, though in the case of parades . An intentional forward movement of an offensive players arm is considered the start of a forward pass, according to a former NFL rule that was implemented in 1999. Brady's answer: probably not. Brady was patting the ball. @tooz56 raidernationabby the rule is correct. In 2018, Gruden returned to coach the Raiders after a 9-year stint as a television analyst. . A lot of people see the incident as one of the NFLs great what ifs. For once, it was the Raiders that got Hustled. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Once he saw a replay, Coleman quickly reversed his previous ruling, telling ESPN it was an "easy" call. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.[1]. Please check the opt-in box to acknowledge that you would like to subscribe. at Iron supplements should not be taken at the same, The goal is to build up layers of paraffin by dipping in and out of the TherabathPRO. You had your chance the next season, and the Bucs beat you by 50 touchdowns From the tuck rule game in 2002 through to the ineligible receiver confusion in 2015, Bill Belichick's Patriots have continually forced viewers to consult the rule book. The fact that so many Raider fans are still this upset tells me that things have evened out for that bad call in 1976. ", 2020 THE SUN, US, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED | TERMS OF USE | PRIVACY | YOUR AD CHOICES | SITEMAP, The 'tuck rule' became famous after a New England vs Oakland showdown in 2002, Brady in action during snowy conditions at what became known as the 'Tuck Rule Game'. "I volunteer as tribute!", "I want the audience to recognise you when you're in the arena," says Cinna dreamily. (Of course raiders sold the most merchandise back then and where a very popular team ..the league was not about to put NE in the superbowl they would have lost $$$ at the time). If he gets hit while attempting to throw a pass then it would be incomplete as long as the ball goes forward. How is the ref supposed to determine the exact moment when an arm moving forward transitions from a throwing motion to a tucking motion? The newest 30 for 30 will, however, be streaming on ESPN+, which is available for $6.99/month,. Sometimes you have to look past the ignorant terms and complex meanings inside a rule book and watch the damn play. Dont fix what aint broke. The Tuck rule should have never came into play. The Raiders at one point paralyzed a Patriot player. QBs dont deserve a free pass. . That's before and after the LOS so this would mean most passes would be contested on the field. Dont let revisionist history fool you: This wasnt some great Oakland team that was destined to win it all. [18], Coordinates: .mw-parser-output .geo-default,.mw-parser-output .geo-dms,.mw-parser-output .geo-dec{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .geo-nondefault,.mw-parser-output .geo-multi-punct{display:none}.mw-parser-output .longitude,.mw-parser-output .latitude{white-space:nowrap}420534N 711603W / 42.09269N 71.26744W / 42.09269; -71.26744. A ten year mental lapse thanks Mike! Well start with Brady. Tom Brady has won 35 postseason games, by far the most in NFL history. I love how people act like the Pats won against the Raiders only because of the tuck rule. In week 2 of the NFL season in 2001. Really? They all need to be replaced and as far away from a football game as possible if they cant see thats a fumble. [wibbitz id=ba2b1026dd9d543798567c65a946e1b70 autoplay=false], Sign up for the For The Win newsletter to get our top stories in your inbox every morning. (Of course raiders sold the most merchandise back then and where a very popular team ..the league was not about to put NE in the superbowl they would have lost $$$ at the time), As far as the tuck rule.. Patriots should have had 1st and 10 with an extra 15 yards. Everybody Knows Pats ring dont mean nothing. Then drop it. 2004-2023 CBS Interactive. No choice but to respect the officials probably correct decision. Well guess what, the raiders won the game when Woodson forced the fumble and Beikert fell on it. The rule makes sense the way it is, changing it would just create ambiguity. The hit that time came from Tony Bryant rather than Charles Woodson. The Rams were known at the time as the greatest show on turf, but Brady and the Patriots defeated the Rams 20-17. . I dont give a damn if you, the rule book, Mike Pereira, Roger Godell, The Fonz, the Waterboy, Radio, or every cafeteria lady in America says that it was an incomplete pass.the replay clearly shows it was a fumble! 2 The 'tuck rule' became famous after a New England vs Oakland showdown in 2002 Credit: AFP He then got hit and fumbled. The end of Tom Brady's long career arrived Tuesday as the seven-time Super Bowl champion announced his retirement from the NFL after 22 years. 1:13 pm ET. I am so sick of hearing about the tuck rule. hahaha Ben????? The Patriots would go on to win the game in overtime on field goals kicked by Adam Vinatieri with a ball implanted with small but powerful magnets designed. Plain and simple. How would that be a fumble? There should also be some kind of rule that stops the Patriots from acquiring draft picks in one year, that turn out to be better the next. "[16] With seconds left on the clock after the ensuing kickoff, the Raiders decided not to attempt to advance the ball, instead letting it go to overtime. Why? I dont even think Cassel was tucking the ball. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.". Here is the problem, and why the tuck rule is a rule. So the rule was fine for 10 years but now you see the wrong it it???? But yeah I agree with you, nowadays at least it wouldn't be overturned with the whole evidence thing. Im sure its no consolation to the many Raiders fans around the country. Nonetheless, Raiders quarterback Rich Gannon completed 10 of 14 passes for 87 yards. In March 2013, the NFL committee proposed to league owners that they vote to eliminate the tuck rule. Karma as they say, Is. I have done this and Woodson blitzed off the corner, forced a fumble and greg beikert recovered it winning the game for the Raiders. Now, in 1976, an old, blind ref name Ben Dreith, called a phantom roughing the passer penalty on Ray Hamilton of the Patriots in an AFC divisional against the Raiders. An existing rule was strengthened as a result of this. They are the ones who make up these rules and train the refs in interpreting them. Think Pereiras pension and/or benefits from his former employer may be lost in the mail? On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. Luke Straub. (This was also the game in which Patriots quarterback Drew Bledsoe was injured by a hit from Mo Lewis, giving backup Tom Brady a chance to play.). sick and tired of Pereira, self-promoting pompous a$$, he would support such a change who cares. In the end JUSTICE prevailed. It was the right call. The thing that makes no sense is is that the refs had to have been 100% certain that when Brady brought the ball in it did not touch his other hand. This is referred to as the tuck rule because the ball leaving the quarterback's hands is considered a forward pass even if the quarterback intends not to pass the ball, but instead continues the forward motion to tuck the ball back into his body. When [an offensive] player is holding the ball to pass it forward, any intentional forward movement of his arm starts a forward pass, even if the player loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body. Now to take a look at this play and the impact it had, let's take a time machine back to 2002. If it goes beyond the line of scrimmage it's an incomplete pass. The season had been wild for the Patriots, who began the year 02 after veteran quarterback Drew Bledsoe suffered a sheared blood vessel in his chest[6] in the game against the New York Jets. If they had called roughing the passer when Woodson gave Brady a forearm shiver to the side of the head like they should have the Raiders fans would have had to find something else to complain about for the last 9 years. The "tuck rule" grew in prominence in 2002, when an apparent Tom Brady fumble on this play was called back because of the rule. After review. See my post before yours. Elyasmmy earlier reply to you did not get posted like it should have. At all the Raider knuckleheads: My problem being they didn't even enforce it right against us, Brady has completed his pass motion, he is not in the middle of it. The tuck rule was enforced in a regular season game on October 9, 2005, between the Washington Redskins and the Denver Broncos. If the decision had remained a fumble, it would have almost certainly sealed the game for Oakland. Buy Raiders Tickets. That being said, this is the NFL and it is what it is until they change it. With the Patriots heading to the Black Hole to meet the Raiders on. The tuck rule was implemented so refs wouldnt have to define the exact moment that a QB has stopped throwing, and instead is tucking the ball. Now he tells us! Tuck rule or not the raiders got robbed. But, then again, he had already built up that reputation as a defensive coordinator with the Giants his game plan for Super Bowl XXV against the Bills is actually in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. But now Pereira says the rule needs to be scrapped. Them I feel sorry for. Learn how your comment data is processed. The Tuck Rule was a rule in the National Football League (NFL) that stated that if a quarterback lost control of the ball while trying to bring it back to his body (and it was not because he fumbled it), it would be called an incomplete pass, not a fumble. As a Raider fan, I have a different take on the matter. [1] Broncos quarterback Jake Plummer lost the football while in the Broncos' own end zone. If it is taken out, you have to decide when the forward arm motion stops being a pass and starts to become fumble territory. An existing rule was strengthened as a result of this. And since he'll retire after calling half the Pro Bowl later this month, he'll never get the chance. The ruling made the game exceptionally hard to referee, as well as giving a big advantage to the quarterback. Brady pump faked, never saw or felt woodson coming from behind. NFL Rule 3, Section 22, Article 2, and Note 2 were stated. ", "10 highlights from Jon Gruden's Raiders news conference, including 'Tom Brady fumbled' Reference", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tuck_Rule_Game&oldid=1142353824, Sports competitions in Foxborough, Massachusetts, January 2002 sports events in the United States, 21st century in Foxborough, Massachusetts, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, This page was last edited on 1 March 2023, at 23:18. No . On January 19, 2002, NFL history was changed forever. It's not that the tuck rule is bad (that's a whole other thing I'm not gonna go into), it's that the call itself was shit. I've heard it as week 2 and also your later game against the Jets. US AGAINST THE MEDIA No waitMost likely the Steelers would have thrashed the Patriots in the AFC Championship gameOh well. [8] The only team to vote against the elimination of the tuck rule was the Pittsburgh Steelers, while the New England Patriots and Washington Redskins abstained from the vote. It was 2001. Raiders fans wont be happy until anti-incest laws are repealed. Terry Kirby returned the ensuing kickoff 22 yards to the Oakland 37-yard line and the Raiders produced a 10-play, 43-yard drive to score on a 38-yard field goal from Sebastian Janikowski. WE WILL WIN! This seems like it would mess up the plays where the QB fumbles the ball and then smacks it forward 20 yards. Geeze the moron Raider fans really come out over the tuck rule. But on replay, Carey said it was an incomplete pass because of the tuck rule. When can I drink milk after taking iron supplements. He did, New England won and Brady went on to forge an NFL dynasty. 4. One, the Patriots are still moving forward from that moment and two, someone has to track down that old bastard Dreith and beat the truth out of him about his officiating in that playoff game. New England ended up advancing into field goal range and an Adam Vinatieri 45-yard field goal sent the game into overtime. Anything else? [1], The tuck rule was also enforced in an NFL playoff game on January 9, 2011, between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Baltimore Ravens. From 1999 to 2013, the National Football League used the tuck rule, which was a contentious rule in American football. It applied if the quarterback moved his arm forward in a passing motion, but then changed his mind and tried to keep hold of the football rather than attempt a pass. That has to be the dumbest rule in the book. Hearing Lewis say that the tuck rule is the only reason we know about a man who's won three Super Bowls, has twice been named NFL MVP (including the first-ever unanimous MVP), has made 10. The reality is, the Patsies were manufacturing timeouts by having Brady take hits on pump-fakes. IMO -if the QB is so pressured by the defense that the ball comes loose,if forward motion doesnt carry the ball past the line of scrimmage (or to the feet of an eligible receiver in the backfield) then it should be a fumble. But then, they wont have anything to whine about for the next ten years. I love how people act like the Pats won against the Raiders only because of the tuck rule. However, in the fourth quarter, Brady led the Patriots on a 10-play, 67-yard drive, completing nine consecutive passes for 61 yards and finishing it with a 6-yard touchdown run with 7:57 left that made the score 1310. The NFL is the only football league that has this Tuck Rule. This is referred to as the tuck rule because the ball leaving the quarterback's hands is considered a forward pass even if the quarterback intends not to pass the ball, but instead continues the forward motion to tuck the ball back into his body. Get over it, pathetic Raiders fans. "More than 68 percent of the leagues passes are short throws that target receivers either behind the line of scrimmage or within 10 yards of it. While it appeared that Brady had tucked the ball back towards his body, the officials were not sure and ruled it a fumble so they could review the play. So get over it, Charles Woodson. Yes, we have hit the 20-year anniversary of the famous infamous Tuck Rule game. Plain and simple. Nope. Tuck Rule AKA F@cked Rule because someone always gets F@cked as a result of this rule!! Tom Brady finally admits Tuck Rule play 'might have been a fumble'. We all know, as well, that the Patsies were cheating during that game, even if Roger Goodell is too afraid to admit it. When did the tuck rule first become effective? Sometimes you have to look past the ignorant fans and complex rationalizations they come up with and watch the damn play. Buy Raiders Tickets. remember its the same ref that was in for the ravens vs raiders championship a year before when that fat lose goose broke gannons arm so the raiders would lose Commentary on this game did not end after the season, the "Tuck Rule Game" has been debated since, with many, possibly even Brady, calling it a fumble. By Pereiras estimate, its been called 120-150 times since it was called in the Raiders-Patriots playoff game (see 2005 story linked in my earlier post) and many times before then, so every team has experienced it MULTIPLE TIMES, though admittedly with lesser importance than that famous instance. Tge play wasnt even important in the chefs game but changed nfl history in the raiders game. The latest installment of ESPN's "30 for 30" series, "The Tuck Rule," examines the circumstances that led to the (in)famous incident in the waning stages of a game in the 2001-02 NFL playoffs..